What is a flood attack?

A flood attack, often a form of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, aims to overwhelm a system with superfluous requests, thus preventing legitimate requests from being fulfilled. The primary objective is to make the target service unavailable, either by consuming all its resources or crashing it altogether. Flood attacks exploit the limitations of a network’s bandwidth, memory, and processing power. By sending an excessive number of requests, they can exhaust these resources rapidly, causing severe disruptions. Attackers often use botnets, a network of compromised devices, to generate the enormous volume of traffic required for such attacks, making it harder to trace and block the sources.

How does it work?

A flood attack works by sending a massive volume of traffic to a targeted server, service, or network. This traffic often appears to be from legitimate users, which makes it challenging to distinguish and filter out. The target system gets overwhelmed by this surge in requests, which eventually leads to its degradation or shutdown. Flood attacks can be executed through various protocols and methods, such as TCP, UDP, ICMP, and HTTP, each exploiting different aspects of the network’s communication process. Advanced flood attacks may use randomization techniques to avoid detection and mitigation efforts, making them more sophisticated and harder to counter.

Why is flood attack dangerous?

• Disruption of service: The most immediate impact is the service disruption. Websites may become unavailable, networks may slow down, and businesses may experience downtime.
• Financial impacts: With downtime comes lost revenue. Especially for businesses that rely heavily on online services, a few minutes of inaccessibility can translate to significant financial losses.
• Damage to reputation: Continuous attacks can tarnish a company’s reputation, causing loss of customer trust and loyalty.
• Resource consumption: An immense amount of resources, both human and technological, need to be diverted to handle the aftermath of such attacks.
• Diversion: Sometimes, attackers use flood attacks as a smokescreen, diverting attention from a more covert breach or intrusion.

How to mitigate it?

• Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of network traffic can help in early detection of unusual traffic spikes, which may indicate a flood attack. Tools like intrusion detection systems (IDS) can be invaluable.
• DDoS Protection: DDoS protection services can help mitigate the effects of a flood attack. These services often use a combination of traffic filtering, rate limiting, and other tactics to ensure only legitimate traffic reaches the target. 
• Secondary DNS: If the primary DNS server becomes overwhelmed due to a flood attack, the secondary DNS server can continue to resolve domain names, ensuring that services remain accessible to legitimate users.
• Firewalls and Routers: Properly configured firewalls and routers can help filter out malicious traffic.
  Router vs firewall
• TTL Analysis: Investigate the TTL values on incoming packets. Abnormal TTLs can indicate potential malicious traffic.
• IP Blocklisting: Identify and block IPs that show malicious activity. This prevents them from accessing your systems further.
  Whitelisting vs Blacklisting

Types of flood attack

DNS Flood Attack

A DNS flood attack specifically targets the Domain Name System (DNS) servers. The DNS is the internet’s phonebook, translating human-friendly URLs (like “example.com“) into IP addresses that computers use to identify each other on the network (like “1.2.3.4”). In a DNS flood attack, attackers send a high volume of DNS lookup requests, usually using fake IP addresses. This causes the DNS servers to try and resolve each request, leading to an overwhelming number of processes. This congestion ensures that genuine requests from real users either get significantly delayed or ignored altogether. If an attacker successfully disrupts a DNS server, it can make a whole swath of websites or online services inaccessible.

SYN Flood Attack

To understand a SYN flood attack, one must first grasp the “three-way handshake” process used to establish a TCP connection. The sequence is SYN, SYN-ACK, and ACK. In a SYN flood attack, the attacker sends a rapid succession of SYN requests but either does not respond to the SYN-ACK replies or sends them from spoofed IP addresses. The target system will keep these connections open, waiting for the final ACK that never comes. This can consume all available slots for new connections, effectively shutting out legitimate users.

HTTP Flood Attack

HTTP flood attacks take advantage of the HTTP protocol that web services operate on. In this attack, a massive number of HTTP requests are sent to an application. Unlike other flood attacks, the traffic sent looks legitimate. The requests can be either valid URL routes or a mixture with invalid ones, making them harder to detect. Because the requests look so much like typical user traffic, they’re particularly difficult to filter out. This method can exhaust server resources and cause legitimate requests to time out or receive delayed responses.

ICMP (Ping) Flood Attack

ICMP, or Internet Control Message Protocol, is a network protocol used by network devices to send error messages. The “ping” tool uses ICMP to test the availability of network hosts. In a Ping flood attack, attackers inundate the target with ICMP Echo Request (or ‘ping’) packets. The target then tries to respond to each of these requests with an Echo Reply. If the attack is voluminous enough, the target system’s bandwidth or processing capabilities may get overwhelmed, causing a denial of service.

Suggeted page: The function of ICMP Ping monitoring

UDP Flood

User Datagram Protocol (UDP) is a sessionless networking protocol. In a UDP flood attack, the attacker sends many UDP packets, often with spoofed sender information, to random ports on a victim’s system. The victim’s system will try to find the application associated with these packets but will not find any. As a result, the system will often reply with an ICMP ‘Destination Unreachable’ packet. This process can saturate the system’s resources and bandwidth, preventing it from processing legitimate requests.

Impact of Flood attacks on different industries

Flood attacks can have devastating effects across various industries, each facing unique challenges and potential damages:

E-commerce:

E-commerce platforms rely heavily on their websites for sales and customer interaction. A flood attack can cause significant downtime, leading to lost sales, decreased customer trust, and potential long-term damage to the brand’s reputation. Additionally, the costs associated with mitigating the attack and enhancing security measures can be substantial.

Suggest: Global Reach, Local Touch: The Role of GeoDNS in eCommerce Expansion

Finance:

In the finance sector, the availability and integrity of online services are critical. Flood attacks can disrupt online banking, trading platforms, and payment processing systems. This not only affects customer transactions but can also lead to compliance issues and regulatory scrutiny. The financial losses and impact on customer confidence can be severe.

Healthcare:

Healthcare providers use online systems for patient management, medical records, and telemedicine. A flood attack can interrupt these services, potentially putting patient health at risk. Delayed access to medical records and appointment scheduling can cause significant operational disruptions and affect the quality of care provided.

Gaming:

The gaming industry is a frequent target of flood attacks, especially during major events or game launches. These attacks can disrupt gameplay, causing frustration among users and leading to a loss of revenue for gaming companies. The competitive nature of online gaming also means that downtime can significantly impact player engagement and retention.

Conclusion

Flood attacks are among the oldest tools in a hacker’s arsenal, but they remain effective. As the digital landscape grows and evolves, so do the methods attackers employ. Regularly updating security infrastructure, staying informed about emerging threats, and employing a proactive defense strategy can go a long way in keeping systems secure and operational.

The post Flood Attack: Prevention and Protection appeared first on ClouDNS Blog.

It helps determine if the transferred data is reaching its target destination on time. For that reason, ICMP is an essential element when it comes to the error reporting process and testing. However, it often gets utilized in DDoS (Distributed Denial-of-Service) attacks.

History of ICMP

The ICMP protocol was conceived as a vital component of the Internet Protocol Suite, introduced in 1981 with RFC 792. Its origins can be traced back to the early days of the internet when the need for a diagnostic and error-reporting tool was identified. Over the years, ICMP has experienced several refinements, with additional message types being introduced. Its fundamental purpose of providing feedback about issues related to datagram processing has remained consistent throughout, making it an indispensable tool for network diagnostics.

What is ICMP protocol used for?

The ICMP protocol could be used in several different ways. They are the following:

The main purpose of ICMP is to report errors

Let’s say we have two different devices that connect via the Internet. Yet, an unexpected issue appeared, and the data from the sending device did not arrive correctly at the receiving device. In such types of unpleasant situations, ICMP is able to help. For instance, the problem is occurring because the packets of data are too large, and the router is not capable of handling them. Therefore, the router is going to discard the data packets and send an ICMP message to the sender. That way, it informs the sending device of the issue.

ICMP is commonly used as a diagnostic tool

It is used to help determine the performance of a network. The two popular utilities, Traceroute and Ping, operate and use it. They both send messages regarding whether data was successfully transmitted.

• The Traceroute command is helpful for displaying and making it easy to understand the routing path between two different Internet devices. It shows the actual physical path of connected routers that handle and pass the request until it reaches its target destination. Each travel from one router to another is called a “hop.” The Traceroute command also reveals to you how much time it took for each hop along the way. Such information is extremely useful for figuring out which network points along the route are causing delays.
• The Ping command is similar, yet a little bit more simple. It tests the speed of the connection between two different points, and in the report, you can see precisely how long it takes a packet of data to reach its target and return to the sender’s device. Despite the fact that the Ping command does not supply additional data about routing or hops, it is still an extremely beneficial tool for estimating the latency between two points. The ICMP echo-request and echo-reply messages are implemented during the ping process.

Cybercriminals utilize it too

Their goal is to disturb the normal network performance. They initiate different attacks, such as an ICMP flood, a Smurf attack, and a Ping of death attack. Attackers are determined to overwhelm the victim and make the standard functionality not possible.

How does it work?

Internet Control Message Protocol stands as one of the leading protocols of the IP suite. Yet, it is not associated with any transport layer protocol, for instance, Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) or User Datagram Protocol (UDP).

ICMP is one of the connectionless protocols, which means that a sending device is not required to initiate a connection with the receiving party before transmitting the data. That is why it differs from TCP, for instance, where a connection between the two devices is a mandatory requirement. Only when both devices are ready through a TCP handshake, a message could be sent.

All ICMP messages are sent as datagrams and include an IP header that holds the ICMP data. Each datagram is a self-contained, independent entity of data. Picture it as a packet holding a portion of a larger message across the network. ICMP packets are IP packets with ICMP in the IP data part. ICMP messages also include the complete IP header from the original message. That way, the target system understands which precise packet failed. 

ICMP Packet Format

ICMP is designed to be used within IP packets. When an ICMP message is sent, it is encapsulated within an IP packet, and the ICMP header follows the IP header within that packet.

In the ICMP packet format, the first 32 bits of the packet are divided into three fields:

Type (8-bit): The initial 8 bits of the packet specify the message type, providing a brief description so the receiving network knows the kind of message it is receiving and how to respond. Common message types include:

• Type 0: Echo reply
• Type 3: Destination unreachable
• Type 5: Redirect Message
• Type 8: Echo Request
• Type 11: Time Exceeded
• Type 12: Parameter problem

Code (8-bit): The next 8 bits are for the code field, which provides additional information about the error message and its type.

Checksum (16-bit): The last 16 bits are for the checksum field, which checks the number of bits in the complete message to ensure that all data is delivered correctly.

Extended Header (32-bit): The next 32 bits of the ICMP header are the Extended Header, which points out issues in the IP message. Byte locations are identified by the pointer which causes the problematic message. The receiving device uses this information to pinpoint the issue.

Data/Payload: The final part of the ICMP packet is the Data or Payload, which is of variable length. In IPv4, the payload includes up to 576 bytes, while in IPv6, it includes up to 1280 bytes.

Types and codes in ICMP

ICMP messages are distinguished by their type and, in some cases, a code to further specify the nature of the message. There are numerous types, each serving a unique purpose. A few common types include:

• Echo Reply (Type 0): A response to an echo request, commonly used in ping.
• Destination Unreachable (Type 3): Indicates that the destination is unreachable for some reason. Various codes further specify the reason, such as network unreachable (Code 0), host unreachable (Code 1), or protocol unreachable (Code 2).
• Redirect (Type 5): Informs the host to send its packets on an alternative route. The accompanying codes provide more details, like redirect for the network (Code 0) or redirect for the host (Code 1).
• Time Exceeded (Type 11): Generated when a packet takes too long to transit a network or when reassembly time is exceeded.

These are just a few examples, and there are many other types and codes in the ICMP specification that serve various purposes.

Configuring ICMP on routers and firewalls

Configuring ICMP settings on routers and firewalls is essential to either allow ICMP traffic, prioritize it, or block it to enhance security. Here’s a brief guide:

On Routers:

1. Access the router’s admin panel, usually through a web interface or command line.
2. Navigate to the advanced settings or firewall settings.
3. Look for an option related to ICMP or ‘Ping Request’ and either enable or disable it as required.

On Firewalls:

1. Open the firewall management interface.
2. Search for a rule or setting related to ICMP traffic.
3. Modify the rule to allow, block, or prioritize ICMP traffic based on your needs.

It’s crucial to consult the router or firewall’s documentation or seek expert advice, as incorrect configurations might result in network vulnerabilities or communication problems.

Router vs firewall, can you guess which is better?

ICMP Port?

As we mentioned earlier, the Internet Control Message Protocol is a part of the Internet protocol suite, also known as the TCP/IP protocol suite. That means it relates only to the Internet Layer. Port numbers are only found in the Transport Layer, which is the layer above.

Although Internet Control Message Protocol does not implement the concept of ports like TCP and UDP, it utilizes types and codes. Typically employed ICMP types are echo request and echo reply (used for Ping) and TTL (time-to-live) exceeded in transit (used for Traceroute).

What is ICMP Ping?

The ICMP echo request and the ICMP echo reply messages are also known as ping messages. Ping command is a beneficial troubleshooting tool that system administrators use to test for connectivity between network devices manually. They also use it for examining for network delay and loss packets.

ICMP Ping is especially useful for performing Ping Monitoring. It works by frequently pinging a precise device. This type of check sends an ICMP echo request to a specific server or device on the network, and the device instantly answers with an ICMP echo reply. That means the connection is successful, and the target server or device is up and running without any issues. 

In case the ping time, which is measured in milliseconds (ms), is prolonged, that is a sure sign of some network issues. 

ICMP vs TCP

The Internet Control Message Protocol, or ICMP, has a completely different function compared to TCP (Transmission Control Protocol). Unlike it, ICMP is not a standard data packet protocol. Moreover, it is a control protocol, and it is not designed to deal with application data. Instead, it is used for inter-device communication, carrying everything from redirect instructions to timestamps for synchronization between devices. It is important to remember that ICMP is not a transport protocol that sends data between different devices.

On the other hand, TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is a transport protocol, which means it is implemented to pass the actual data. It is a very popular protocol, thanks to its reliability. TCP transfers the data packets in a precise order and guarantees their proper delivery and error correction. Therefore, the Transmission Control Protocol finds its place in many operations, including email and file transfers. It is the preferred choice when we want to ensure ordered, error-free data, and speed is not the top priority.

Suggested page: What TCP monitoring is?

ICMP in IPv6 (ICMPv6)

With the growing adoption of IPv6, ICMP has also evolved to cater to the needs of the newer IP protocol. ICMPv6, introduced with RFC 4443, is more than just an adaptation; it incorporates various features and functionalities tailored for IPv6. For instance:

• Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP): ICMPv6 includes NDP, replacing the ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) used in IPv4, facilitating the discovery of neighboring devices.
• Router Solicitation and Advertisement: ICMPv6 aids in the discovery of routers in a network and can solicit advertisements from them.
• Enhanced Error Reporting: ICMPv6 offers more detailed feedback, facilitating improved troubleshooting in IPv6 networks.

As the internet continues its transition from IPv4 to IPv6, the importance and relevance of ICMPv6 will only grow, making it vital for network professionals to familiarize themselves with its intricacies.

Suggested article: IPv4 vs IPv6 and where did IPv5 go?

How is ICMP used in DDoS attacks?

DDoS (Distributed Denial-of-Service) attacks are extremely popular cyber threats. They are initiated with the main goal to overwhelm the victim’s device, server, or network. As a result, the attack prevents regular users from reaching the victim’s services. There are several ways an attacker can utilize ICMP to execute these attacks, including the following:

• ICMP flood attack

ICMP flood, also commonly called Ping flood attack, attempts to overwhelm the target device with ICMP echo request packets. That way, the victim device is required to process and respond to each echo request with echo reply messages. That consumes all of the existing computing resources of the target and prevents legitimate users from receiving service.

The basics of flood attacks

• Ping of death attack

The Ping of Death attack appears when a cybercriminal sends a ping larger than the maximum permitted size for a packet to a victim device. As a result, the device crashes. The large packet is fragmented on its way to the victim. However, when the device reassembles it into its original, the size exceeds the limit and causes a buffer overflow. 

The Ping of Death is considered a historical attack that does not appear anymore. Yet, that is not completely true. Operating systems and networking equipment that is more aged could still become a victim of it.

• Smurf attack

The Smurf attack is another common threat where the cybercriminal sends an ICMP packet with a spoofed source IP address. The network equipment responds to the packet and sends the replies to the spoofed IP, which floods the target with large amounts of ICMP packets. 

Just like the Ping of Death attack, the Smurf attack should not be disregarded. Unfortunately, in a lot of different companies and organizations, the equipment is a bit aged, and the threat is real!

Conclusion

The ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) is an incredible network layer protocol that allows devices to report errors and improve their communication. Moreover, it is a great tool for network diagnosis. It is not a surprise that a lot of administrators use it daily for a better understanding of their network with the popular utilities Ping and Traceroute. Even more beneficial is the Ping monitoring, which completes regular checks. Lastly, keep in mind to take proper supervision of your network, so it stays protected from DDoS attacks that utilize the protocol for malicious purposes.

The post What is ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol)? appeared first on ClouDNS Blog.

Understanding ICMP Ping 

At the core of Ping traffic monitoring lies the ICMP Ping protocol, a mainstay in network diagnostics. ICMP Ping is utilized to assess the reachability and performance of a host within an IP network by measuring the round-trip time (RTT) for message exchanges. These messages, or “echo requests,” are sent to the target host, which, upon receipt, responds with “echo replies.” This interaction provides crucial metrics such as packet loss and response times, which are invaluable for network health assessment.

Ping Traffic Monitoring

ICMP Ping traffic monitoring transcends basic connectivity checks by offering a nuanced view of network performance and health. This approach involves sending packets of varying sizes to a target host and analyzing the response. The rationale behind varying packet sizes is to uncover a broad spectrum of potential issues, from basic connectivity to more complex network path and configuration problems.

Advanced ICMP Ping Checks

To achieve a thorough network diagnosis, ICMP Ping monitoring incorporates three strategic checks:

• 64 Bytes Check: This check sends packets with a 64-byte size, including a 56-byte payload and an 8-byte header. It’s effective for quickly confirming network operability under typical conditions. A successful test indicates no immediate issues with smaller packet sizes, setting a baseline for network performance.
• 512 Bytes Check: As packet size increases, so does the potential for discovering problems that smaller packets might not encounter. The 512-byte check, with a payload of 504 bytes, is particularly useful for identifying issues that occur with medium-sized packets, such as minor packet loss, which might suggest problems with network capacity or minor configuration errors.
• 1024 Bytes Check: The largest of the checks, involving 1024-byte packets, is crucial for diagnosing more severe network problems. Significant packet loss in this test indicates major issues, possibly related to network congestion, hardware limitations, or configuration oversights.

Key Benefits of Regular Ping Traffic Monitoring

Regular Ping monitoring offers several key benefits, including:

• Proactive Problem Identification: Early detection of network anomalies or downtimes, allowing for swift action before users are impacted.
• Performance Benchmarking: Establishing performance baselines and identifying deviations that could indicate emerging issues.
• Network Health Insights: Gaining a comprehensive understanding of network health, including latency, packet loss, and availability metrics.

Comparing ICMP Ping with Other Monitoring Techniques

Comparing ICMP Ping with other monitoring techniques reveals a landscape of network diagnostics tools, each with its strengths and tailored use cases. ICMP Ping, characterized by its simplicity and direct approach, excels at quickly assessing network reachability and latency between two points. It’s invaluable for initial network diagnostics and real-time performance checks. 

On the other hand, SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) monitoring provides a view of network devices’ health and traffic. It can retrieve detailed metrics such as CPU utilization, bandwidth usage, and error rates, offering a comprehensive picture of network performance. SNMP is ideal for ongoing network device management but requires more setup and resources than ICMP Ping.

Synthetic monitoring, another technique, simulates user actions to test the performance of network services and applications. It offers insights into end-user experience and service availability, extending beyond basic network infrastructure monitoring. While synthetic monitoring is powerful for understanding service performance from a user perspective, it may not pinpoint lower-level network issues as directly as ICMP Ping.

Each of these monitoring techniques serves distinct purposes: ICMP Ping for swift connectivity checks, SNMP for detailed device insights, and synthetic monitoring for user experience analysis. The choice among them hinges on your network management goals, network complexity, and the depth of monitoring needed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Ping traffic monitoring, through the ICMP Ping protocol, is crucial for ensuring network health and efficiency. Its straightforward approach offers an indispensable method for quick diagnostics and resolving network issues, making it a foundational tool in network management. By focusing on ICMP Ping’s unique strengths, organizations can proactively address connectivity concerns, maintaining the reliability and performance of their digital infrastructure.

The post Ping Traffic Monitoring: Ensuring Network Health and Efficiency appeared first on ClouDNS Blog.

Historical evolution of the Ping of Death attack

The Ping of Death (PoD) attack has a rich history. In the early days of the internet, networks and devices were less sophisticated and more susceptible to various forms of cyber attacks, including the Ping of Death. The original PoD attack involved sending malformed or oversized packets using the ICMP protocol, which could crash systems or cause network interruptions. This vulnerability was particularly prevalent in older operating systems that didn’t properly handle these packets.

Over time, as operating systems and network hardware became more advanced, they were patched to resist these types of attacks. This led to the evolution of PoD tactics, with attackers finding new methods to exploit different vulnerabilities within network protocols and systems.

What is Ping of Death (PoD)?

Ping of Death (PoD) is a popular type of DoS (Denial of Service) attack. The cybercriminal that initiates it aims to destabilize or completely crash the device, server, or service of the victim. In order to achieve that, the attacker sends malformed or oversized packets with the help of the Ping command. Unfortunately, the moment when the victim’s system processes the data packet, the system faces an error that forces it to crash.

The concept of the Ping of Death (PoD) attack is commonly compared to a mail bomb: If the recipient opens the package, a mechanism is triggered, and the target is attacked or completely destroyed. 

On the other hand, the Ping command, from which the attack gets its name, is a popular tool for testing the reachability of a network. The command is designated based on the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), which serves for providing status information on the Internet.

Ping of Death attacks could occur on patched and unpatched systems that have legacy weaknesses on the target systems. The cybercriminal does not even need any additional details about the target’s device or its operating system (OS). The only required information is the IP address and nothing else.

So, now that you are familiar with what a Ping of Death attack is, it is time to dive a little bit deeper and explain how it actually works.

How does it work?

To enable a Ping of Death attack, criminals use the ping command to send oversized data packets to their target to destabilize or crash it. 

An Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) echo-reply message, also known as “ping”, is a network utility that serves for testing a network connection. It sends out pings and waits for an ICMP echo reply, which contains information about the condition and environment of a precise network. That means the connection is successful.

In order to launch a Ping of Death attack, attackers create an ICMP packet that’s larger than allowed. The packet is separated into smaller pieces for transportation. When the receiver puts them back together, the maximum allowed size is exceeded. That leads to an overflow in the memory buffer, forcing the system to crash.

To bring it all together, the maximum packet size for IPv4 is 65,535 bytes, including a total payload of 84 bytes. Thus in order to launch a PoD attack, cybercriminals send bigger than 110k ping packets to the victim’s device.  

Attackers can also perform this DoS attack over the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), Internet Packet Exchange (IPX), and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). Anything that sends an Internet Protocol datagram can be put into action.

Here’s what a Ping of Death looks like on Windows and Linux :

Ping of Death Windows:

ping <ip address> -1 65500 -w 1 -n 1

Ping of Death Linux:

ping <ip address> -s 65500 -t 1 -n 1

Does the Ping of Death still work?

The Ping of Death (PoD) is actually quite an old attack that first occurred back in the mid-1990s. Since then, the majority of devices and computers have been protected against these types of attacks. Additionally, a lot of websites keep blocking ICMP ping messages in order to stop and avoid future variations of this DoS attack.

Yet, an organization’s defenses can weaken due to malicious content on any computer, server, or network and still be vulnerable to the threat. It is threatened by this attack if the following are unpatched:

• Vulnerable Legacy Equipment
• Kernel driver in TCPIP.sys
• Windows XP and Windows Server 2013 copies on systems already vulnerable to a weakness in OpenType fonts

Recent Ping of Death attacks

Let’s explain a little bit more about some of the recent appearances of the Ping of Death attack.

• PoD attacks officially made their return in August 2013 by threatening the Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) networks. Then the attacker took advantage of a weakness in the soon-to-be discontinued Windows XP and Windows Server 2013 operating systems, more precisely in OpenType fonts. A flaw in the IPv6 implementation of ICMP allowed the attacker to send massive ping requests that smashed the victim when it reassembled the packets. This precise threat could have been avoided simply by disabling IPv6.
• Back in October 2020 was found a flaw in the Windows component TCPIP.sys, which represents a Kernel driver that would get to the core of any Windows system if used for an attacker’s advantage. The result would be a hard crash and total shutdown of the device, followed by a reboot. Yet, it was a bit complicated for cyber criminals to actually use this vulnerability. So, users started patching their devices in order to prevent the threat. 

The Ping of Death seems to be a simple and small-in-scale attack, and that makes it an efficient weapon against particular machines. Yet, we should not underestimate it! If a group of devices comes together, there is a great chance a handful of these to bring down a website that does not have the suitable infrastructure to deal with this threat. These examples from the past indeed show that Ping of Death could still appear. Therefore, it is highly recommended for organizations to take the needed measures to protect themselves.

Preventing measures against PoD attack

There are several ways you could prevent, stop and protect yourself from a Ping of Death (PoD) attack. Most of them are easy and simple to implement. Let’s see which are they and how they can help you avoid Ping of Death. 

• Configure your firewall to block ICMP Ping Messages. This will protect your network from the PoD threat, yet it will also stop legitimate pings. Additionally, invalid packet attacks can be launched through other listening ports, such as FTP (File Transfer Protocol). So, it is not an ideal solution.
• Monitoring with ICMP Ping. If you don’t like the idea of completely blocking ICMP Ping messages, Ping monitoring which is a part of the ClouDNS Monitoring service, would be your preferred solution. It spots network problems quickly and helps you improve your overall security. 

Suggested article: What ICMP Ping traffic monitoring is?

• Implement DDoS Protection. A DDoS protection service provides you with a brilliant technique for network security and protecting against DDoS attacks and Ping of Death attacks.
• Update your software regularly. When a flaw appears, commonly shortly after, the patches are released too. It is important to accept them and keep your device safe.
• Implement a buffer. Improve your capability to accept large packets with an overflow buffer. 
• Filter your traffic. You can stop just fragmented pings from reaching any device in the network. That will allow you to use the ping command’s utility without being at risk of an attack.
• Enable a checker in the assembly process. If it detects large bits of data, it will stop the abnormal packets and prevent crashing.

How to block Ping requests using iptables?

To block ping requests coming to and from your server using iptables, follow these instructions:

First, to reject incoming ping requests, execute the following command:

$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p icmp –icmp-type echo-request -j REJECT

This will lead to an error message being displayed for each blocked ping. If you prefer to silently drop these requests without generating error messages, use the following commands instead:

$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p icmp –icmp-type echo-request -j DROP

$ sudo iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp –icmp-type echo-reply -j DROP

The first command silently blocks incoming ping requests, while the second one prevents sending out ping replies from your server.

Implementing network protocols against PoD attack

In the previous section, we examined the most popular ways to safeguard against Ping of Death attacks. Now, let’s delve into how network protocol-level measures can further fortify your defenses:

• Deep Packet Inspection (DPI): This technique goes beyond basic header analysis to examine the actual data content of packets. DPI can identify, categorize, and block packets that exhibit patterns typical of PoD attacks, such as unusual fragmentation or payload anomalies.
• Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): IDS can be configured to recognize signatures or patterns of PoD attacks. By monitoring network traffic in real-time, IDS can alert administrators and automatically take action against suspicious packets.
• Protocol Anomaly Detection: This method involves analyzing the behavior of protocols like ICMP, TCP, and UDP against established norms. Any deviation from these norms, such as fragmented ICMP packets that could signal a PoD attack, can be flagged for further inspection or blocked.

Suggested article: Full Guide on TCP Monitoring vs. UDP Monitoring

• Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI): Unlike stateless firewalls that only examine packet headers, SPI firewalls track the state of active connections and make decisions based on the context of the traffic. This approach can effectively block malformed packets characteristic of PoD attacks.

Conclusion

You may think that Ping of Death is outdated and it does not have a chance in modern networks. The truth is that this threat should not be neglected. It may find its way and crash your system. Therefore, it is best to take all of the precious measures in order to prevent and stop such malicious attacks.

The post Ping of Death (PoD) – What is it, and how does it work?  appeared first on ClouDNS Blog.